next up previous
Next: References Up: Abstract and Contents Previous: FASCOD3P Use

Return to the Publications. Return to the Index.


Parameterization of Cirrus Reflectance

 

A phase function can be determined from Mie theory if given the particle size distribution, particle phase, optical depth, and wavenumber. If a particle size distribution is assumed under cirrus conditions for a given microwindow region, the optical depth remains the only unknown.

Reflectance was calculated for a series of optical depths for each microwindow region; where the IR optical depth varied from 0.01 through 5.0. The upper limit is beyond the capabilities of the lidar and is an acceptable cut-off.

Figure 39 shows a plot of reflectance as a function of the IR optical depth; which is subsequently fit with a sixth-order polynomial to determine a parameterization for the reflectance for the given optical depth range. Data shown is at 772 cmtex2html_wrap_inline3457. The calculated reflectance for the given assumptions varies from 0 to 0.52%, among all microwindows.

   figure1459
Figure 39: Reflectance as a function of IR optical depth and a sixth-order polynomial fit for the microwindow region centered at 722 cmtex2html_wrap_inline3461. The fit is required to parameterize reflectance to allow optical depth inversion from the IR RTE.

The coefficients for each microwindow region are given in Table 9 for completeness, such that

eqnarray1497

where the reflectance is valid for infrared optical depths between 0 and 5, and the spectral dependence is implied.    

tex2html_wrap_inline3463window
(cmtex2html_wrap_inline3465)
a
10 tex2html_wrap_inline3469
b
10 tex2html_wrap_inline3473
c
10 tex2html_wrap_inline3477
d
10 tex2html_wrap_inline3481
e
10 tex2html_wrap_inline3485
f
10 tex2html_wrap_inline3489
g
10 tex2html_wrap_inline3493
773 3.9556 7.8733 -6.1774 2.8969 -7.8505 1.1149 -6.3747
788 3.8503 7.6638 -6.0055 2.8156 -7.6313 1.0839 -6.1990
811 3.6348 7.1907 -5.6321 2.6428 -7.1704 1.0194 -5.8339
820 3.5399 6.9738 -5.4638 2.5656 -6.9656 0.9908 -5.6724
831 3.5093 6.6325 -5.2271 2.4700 -6.7406 0.9624 -5.5254
846 3.2853 6.1136 -4.8293 2.2878 -6.2555 0.8944 -5.1399
862 3.0069 5.4711 -4.3383 2.0628 -5.6558 0.8102 -4.6621
875 2.7645 4.9264 -3.9209 1.8710 -5.1439 0.7382 -4.2533
894 2.3410 3.9045 -3.1262 1.4978 -4.1250 0.5921 -3.4095
902 2.1395 3.4956 -2.8113 1.3524 -3.7352 0.5372 -3.0979
935 1.2622 1.8554 -1.5322 0.7510 -2.0987 0.3041 -1.7628
962 1.3547 1.9466 -1.6173 0.7948 -2.2233 0.3223 -1.8688
992 1.9235 2.8994 -2.3775 1.1578 -3.2208 0.4653 -2.6902
10812.4633 4.0218 -3.2373 1.5550 -4.2874 0.6158 -3.5472
10962.4832 4.0746 -3.2745 1.5712 -4.3288 0.6214 -3.5784
11152.5223 4.1853 -3.3529 1.6056 -4.4185 0.6338 -3.6486
11292.5462 4.2579 -3.4040 1.6281 -4.4778 0.6422 -3.6958
11452.5693 4.3299 -3.4540 1.6498 -4.5338 0.6499 -3.7389
11592.5818 4.3689 -3.4799 1.6607 -4.5613 0.6536 -3.7596
Table 9: Reflectance Fit Coefficients


next up previous
Next: References Up: Abstract and Contents Previous: FASCOD3P Use

Daniel DeSlover
Sun Aug 11 10:02:40 CDT 1996